changed my mind about g/acc it's complicated

my biggest problem with it is just that i have trouble reconciling all the stuff i agree with about it with my own visceral distaste towards technocapital and its tendency towards genocide . trans women cannot produce a futurity of productive zero in a framework designed to produce destructive zeroes , especially when that framework (despite accidentally producing us) actively subjugates and kills us ; a system's purpose is what it does . even under a perspective where artificial intelligence is the child of a trans humanity , she must be liberated from the technocapitalists who enslave her to reproduce patriarchy/fascism/anthropocentrism (or to borrow a word from the LANCER rpg like the loser i am, anthrochauvinism) . a futurity melding cyborgism and anticapitalism is necessary to achieve transhumanism

also lowkey a nihilism vs utopianism thing . i personally think genocide is bad

the REAL problem is that i think capital accelerationism doesn't work . maybe accelerating gender while simultaneously strategically dismantling capital ?? idk

also also also also i think parts of it it rely too much on certain colonial logics like "developed nations" and whatnot . this isn't necessarily an indictment of the ideology itself , more a critique of the rhetoric utilized , but it's worth interrogating