@nyx the way people (mis)read her is infuriating - if she is discussed at all, everything she wrote gets reduced down to "baby making tubes-- WEIRD!!!" most of what people try to assert is that she's actually structurally misogynistic wrt making reproduction a central problem that needs solving (bc that blames women or some other really bullshit misread), and that she is absurd and utopian. It ends up making reproduction and sex as essential categories of naturalness -- which curiously mimics the way that butlerian critiques of gender end up reinforcing the unquestionability of sex.
(also people just read everything pre-3rd wave shitlib feminism in terrible faith which does not help -- run into this w wittig all the time)