Posts
1453
Following
102
Followers
107
󱤆󱤈
theyre inventing a new kind of terrorist
labrysEstrogen xnfm adjacent
unlicensed legal counsel of las pingas hermanas LPH
@sierra wow..... thanj you
0
0
1

existential threat

Edited 1 month ago
@sierra i should not have made this post on public now i look like a freak infront of everyone
3
0
1
@sierra can you do a stream where you only drink beer and eat chips . can uou do a stream whete you jerk off and smoke weed
1
0
2
@nyx @azureazure @cyb3rm0shp1t @winterklaus sigh.... the words of the empress are law and therefore must be true.... plato was so right
0
0
2
@winterklaus @azureazure @cyb3rm0shp1t @nyx this is kinda fire actually . maybe oomfcest is a good idea
2
2
3
@ikeWren @azureazure @cyb3rm0shp1t @nyx gazing into each others eyes, speaking sweet 0-things, every pair of utterances syzygous
1
1
4
@sierra waiit no way
0
0
0
@nyx @azureazure @cyb3rm0shp1t @winterklaus (laying together in bed looking into one another's eyes tenderly) no i hate ci$$exuals more no i hate amerikkka more no i want to commit the most terrorism
2
4
7
@nyx @azureazure @cyb3rm0shp1t @winterklaus good that sounds like a terrible way to start a relationship
1
0
2
a lot of the argument against drag at least in that thread seems to be that it's a mockery of women which i think is a fundamental misunderstanding of drag . if anything it's a mockery of heteronormative standards for women . this is gonna read as kind of accusatory but i think viewing it as a de facto mockery of women is demonstrative of a kind of normative thinking that is worth interrogating (and the fact that it shares space with assimilationist logics should demonstrate its dubiousness) . but all this im much less sure about than everything else i said
0
0
1

existential threat

Edited 1 month ago
femboys were briefly also briefly touched on in this thread and my position is that femboys are the epitome of trans-adjacent assimilation into patriarchy, cisnormativity, and fetishism . this is the exact reason femboys and femboy fetishizers lean fash . femboys are a unique social role and fit into an extremely misogynistic social topology . i fully believe that the utter destruction of the "femboy" as a socially constructed category is necessary for our liberation . femboys and drag queens share surface-level similarities but fill completely different social positions . to identify as a femboy one must be either profoundly ignorant or an active participant in the transmisogynistic system that produces the category
0
0
1

existential threat

nuance subpost because i dislike hellthreads and love nuance and i ESPECIALLY hate assimilationism . i think all of the following are true:
- there is room to recognize the historical context of drag as an ironic performance of the feminized position gay men have been pressed into by heteronormative society.
- there is an abundant need to critique the privileged position drag now holds in queer communities, especially in contrast to the persistent abuse that trans women face inside and outside those communities. there is especially a need to understand the complex role that patriarchy serves in this issue. i think a better-rounded transfeminist perspective on this needs to be formulated.
- the role that drag plays in the assimilation of queer society into neoliberal heteronormative society is significant. as a tool of assimilationism, drag plays a role in the continued oppression of trans women who will not or cannot assimilate.
- now is a time to reevaluate the ways and extent to which we as queer people value drag as a cultural artifact. we should consider the ways that it both subverts and reinforces patriarchy and cisheteronormativity, and redefine its position in our communities. this does not necessarily necessitate the complete dissolution of drag as a medium! i for one do not think we need to kill drag. it remains emblematic of various queer issues and movements, and i think it does still hold some measure of value in the present era. but we need to reevaluate the reverence that we as a community have for it, especially through a feminist lens.
- assimilationism is infinitely regressive. all that it serves to do is incorporate conformable minorities into the class of the oppressor; regardless, the oppressor continues to produce violence against those outside of its purview. even when the oppressed is successfully assimilated, the oppressor class seeks out a new class to target and exploit; it is still likely to identify and other members of its own group. assimilationism necessarily perpetuates and affirms violence against the oppressed; one sees this in the gay community's participation in the oppression of trans women. cisheteronormativity and patriarchy must be entirely disintegrated for the liberation of all queers and women.
2
1
4
Operation Epic Pussy
0
3
3

@erin himejoshi Descartes be like:

0
2
3
Is yuri real. Do they do that in real life
5
6
14

noord-holland's village idiot

Edited 1 month ago

happy pride to this guy in particular

0
7
7
@Erato_Heti in the socialist utopia there will be state-operated casinos as a form of wealth redistribution. and it will be beautiful
0
1
1
Yeah fuck you fuck your so called friendly reminders. How about this for a fucken friendly reminder: casinos were created by god to grant you the gates to heaven!!
1
1
3

scientist 1: “its pride month. you know what that means”
scientist 2: “what. what do you want us to do,

2
2
3
I'm a rationalist that means nobody wants to fuck me because I want to commit genocide like Magneto
0
2
2
Show older