Defining what is meant by "instinct" and "instinctively" is much much much harder than I think most people realize.
It's almost as big of a mess as "natural"
No one has given a definition of nature that isn't either absurd* OR just vibes based.
However most definitions of "nature" are BOTH.
*including and excluding things that no one would agree makes sense
@futurebird I always just thought it was used as an action that something takes or knowledge someone has that doesn't require conscious thought.
We humans might have some things from birth (avoiding bodily waste, recoiling from pain, etc.), but can train ourselves (or be trained) to add to or subtract from that list.
This is how it is used. But, what do we mean by "the weaver bird builds a nest by instinct"
One thing we mean that is clear, is that they are not taught how to do this by another bird. But if you watch a bird weave they will solve problems, make adjustments, get better at selecting materials. There is learning within the process.
Red isn't as bad since I can show a color just about everyone will agree is red. I can also show "reds" that will start arguments, but there are some reds that are pretty universal. So you can say that red is distributed around these, except when it's contextual. As in "red hair" which is really a warm shade of light brown.
Sometimes when someone hands me something to fix I can't explain what I'm doing. "I'm fixing it."
What is THAT about?